Talk:Test engineer/Archives/2012

Cleanup
I just saw the tag. Let me review the guidelines and clean-up process so I can start editing it again.

Thanks.

Method engineering
It strikes me (as a test engineer) that a lot of this article should be refered to the WikiProject Method engineering, so I have added the appropriate template to the top of this talk page, while at the same time inserting a couple of section headings. DFH 16:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello again David. I'm trying to figure out what else needs to be clean up besides those unreferenced links.  Thanks! &#91;--JC--] 22:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't use capital letters when they aren't required, especially in section headings. See WP:MS and WP:MOSCL. DFH 15:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Suggestions
Debugging to component level is also a part of TE. Follow that, a debug guide would help CM to fix the product you are very familiar with. Fatdragon 06:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Will do. |--JC--| 18:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Software testing category
I don't believe that this article has anything to do with "software testing". I'm taking it off unless otherwise it could be explained here why it can be categorized so. |--JC--| 19:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop putting "software testing" tags throughout this article since this has nothing to do with "testing the software". You are just vandalizing this page. &#124;--JC--&#124; (talk) 01:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the final warning to whoever keeps putting the notes about software test engineers on top of the article... if you want to put links to software test engineers, please make sure you link it to "software test engineers" and NOT "software test". Those are 2 different terminology. Another vandalism will be reported to the moderators. &#124;--JC--&#124; (talk) 01:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)