Talk:Tetraquark

Comments
This page has been redirected to exotic meson because there is a more detailed description there. The candidate states earlier described here do not appear in the 2004 Reviews of Particle Properties, and are therefore unconfirmed. The material here has consequently not been merged into the page on exotic mesons. Bambaiah 07:09, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

"dimeson"?
I notice that dibaryon is about a hexaquark particle of the same kind of configuration as a baryon doubled... and not about a two-baryon composite particle. dimeson would seem to be the equivalent term form this 4-quark particle of the same kind of configuration as a meson doubled... but "dimeson" seems to be about composite particles composed of two mesons? Seems like inconsistent terminology? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

diquark-antidiquark
According to X(3872) article, one tetraquark configuration is the diquark-antidiquark configuration, but statements about Z(4430) seem to say it is a doubled-up meson? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Rename the article to bimeson please. Hcobb (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Tetraquark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040401115040/http://www.kek.jp:80/press/2003/belle4e.html to http://www.kek.jp/press/2003/belle4e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

$\overline{q}$$\overline{q}$QQ discovery confirmed?
Not making the edit as I am by no means an expert on this subject, but in July 2021 CERN reported the discovery of the Tcc+, which contains cc$\overline{u}$$\overline{d}$. I think this means that the sentence in "History and discoveries" that reads "The existence and stability of tetraquark states with the qq$\overline{Q}$$\overline{Q}$ (or $\overline{q}$$\overline{q}$QQ) have been discussed by theoretical physicists for a long time, however these are yet to be reported by experiments" should either be removed or updated, right? Tpth (talk) 03:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Discoveries on July 5th 2022
CERN announced discovery of "first-ever pair of tetraquarks" here. Should it be added to the article? ElfDecker (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)