Talk:Texas Recreational Road 3/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of article is good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Article complies with MoS.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Good.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * References are included where needed.
 * C. No original research:
 * No original research found.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * ''All major aspects of the article have been covered.
 * B. Focused:
 * Article remains focused throughout.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * No image(s) included in the article at this time.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * See comment section below. No image that can be used on Wikipedia was found.''
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 02:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments
I have dealt with the minor issues within the article. My only suggestion is to look for one picture that illustrates something about the topic. At the very least, please attempt to look for an image and if nothing can be found, simply leave a message here or on my talk page and I will gladly pass the article.--Dom497 (talk) 01:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * A user has looked for an image and has told me that no image could be found. Therefore, I will pass the article.--Dom497 (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)