Talk:Textile performance

Template
@ Hi! As per template, i have made minor corrections. Kindly have a look and advise. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 16:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

This article was deleted and Raj blocked last time it was created
Why create it again? I will be proposing deletion. -Roxy . wooF 19:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you read what is the subject of the article? Stop hounding. The subject, matter both are changed in this Performance (textiles).  kindly do not attack or provoke. Better if we focus on the project. RV (talk) 01:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Attribution
Text and references copied from Technical textiles to Performance (textiles), See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 12:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Improvements by the nominator (for deletion )
@ You appear to be convinced of the subject, but your recent contributions] are limiting the scope. It can be rephrased for textile products. It would be best if you also withdraw the deletion before making any positive changes. Otherwise, it could be regarded as vandalism. Thanks RV (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm merely improving on your poor efforts, stop trying to do stuff about which you clearly have such a low level of understanding. Thanks. -Roxy . wooF 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:Civil ought to be honored here. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:CANVASS should have been honoured at the AfD. -Roxy . wooF 14:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You of course have proof of that bullshit accusation? Where is it? Go to WP:ANI, if you dare. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course. You yourself did it, it is on the AfD page, here. You are welcome. -Roxy . wooF 15:44, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That is a baseless accusation. And you know it.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 21:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That's the very essence of canvassing. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 05:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * And what is that? Unconditional support. RV (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You ARS boys do a lot of canvassing, dont you think??. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 12:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. You probably liked the performance. One free piece of advice, when you're in deep shit, it's best to keep your mouth shut!!! That is your present state, so stay quiet. Your discovery here. RV (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Article name
I propose that the name of this article is changed to Fitness for purpose (textiles). -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 08:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * We reject it "according to sources."Keep your proposals under wraps. Because for you, it was Gomutra also. RV (talk) 08:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Who is "we" ? -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 12:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Read and remember the names, except for one. See here . You may exclude your partner's name. Kindly do not hesitate to clear any doubt. RV (talk) 12:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. That was a totally different discussion. try to keep up. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 13:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * "Fitness for purpose" does not seem to be a common phrase for this concept. Suggestions made during the AfD were:
 * 1) high-performance textiles
 * 2) performance-based textiles
 * 3) fabric buying specifications

These titles seem too narrow for such a broad topic. I have suggested "Textile performance", which is much the same as the current title but simpler as it drops the parentheses. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The title "Textile performance" is the most closely related to the references and should meet policy criteria also.Thanks RV (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * "High performance textiles" is a poor suggestion. 'High performance' is undefined. Where does the differentiation lie between between high performance and not quite so high performance? As regards "performance-based textiles" the same consideration applies. All textiles are performance based, tis just the level of performance in various areas that differ. If the word 'performance' is the sticking point, then how about "Textile performance requirements/standards" (choose one). The actual subject is "fitness for purpose" though, regardless what the ARS brigading says. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 13:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Here's some sources in support of the title "textile performance":


 * 1) Mechanics of Textile Performance
 * 2) A New Approach to the Assessment of Textile Performance
 * 3) Physical Properties of Fibres and Textile Performances
 * 4) Textile Performance Problems: Their Causes and Recommendations for Solutions
 * 5) Performance Testing in Textiles
 * 6) Recent developments in the evaluation technology of fiber and textiles: toward the engineered design of textile performance
 * 7) Textile Performance: End Use and Relevant Tests
 * 8) Performance Testing of Textiles


 * Andrew🐉(talk) 13:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Interesting. The common theme running through all those titles? "Fitness for purpose" and "Fabric buying specifications." Srsly! -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 14:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes! They are good. WP:COMMONNAME some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources)RV (talk) 14:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The suggested alternative – "fitness for purpose" – is not fit for purpose because it is a tautology and cliché. See Macmillan... Andrew🐉(talk) 19:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @ Andrew After copy edits the status of Earwig. Kindly have a look. Regards RV (talk) 08:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If there are no meaningful objections to Textile performance as a title, I'll move it there. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, Name of the article has been changed as per suggestion by . Kindly suggest if anything pending or incorrect. Regards RV (talk) 10:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)