Talk:Théo Maledon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 09:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

 * It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
 * It contains copyright infringements -
 * It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include,, or large numbers of , , or similar tags. (See also ). -
 * It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
 * The last sentence of the general/overview section is a troll. -

Lede

 * ASVEL of the LNB Pro A - these are club and league names right? Probably best to spell this out.
 * Standing 1.92 m (6 ft 3 1⁄2 in), he plays the point guard position. - unless you know about basketball, you wouldn't know why this is relevant.
 * Probably best to say where Rouen is (Ie, Normandy, France.)
 * breakout success - puff
 * becoming the youngest LNB All-Star in history and winning the LNB Pro A Best Young Player award. - needs explaination. Quite jargony.
 * There's a lot of acronyms here, (LNB, ASVEL, MVP, FIBA, INSEP), might be better to rewrite to explain some of these.
 * Representing France internationally - well, you wouldn't represent France nationally. Perhaps write "At youth international level, he won a"...

General

 * Could we get a WP:short description?
 * Birthdate is mentioned in lede and infobox, but not in prose, and is uncited.
 * U11 - playing at the under-11 age group. This is true for all UX
 * prestigious - puff
 * link/explain "starter"
 * season-high 26 - you say he scored 35 in an early sentence?
 * Maledon signed his first professional contract, - was his first season not professional?
 * Even though he played at the pro level in his first season, it was not on a pro contract Sportzeditz (talk) 14:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * and four assists, shooting 6-of-7 from the field, in an 88–64 victory over Fos Provence - jargon. Needs explaination
 * Maledon made his debut for France - generally we refer this would be for the senior squad, perhaps have the word youth in there somewhere.

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA and FA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
 * Hi - not too much to do. See above - on hold for now. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 13:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I have addressed your comments. Sportzeditz (talk) 14:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)