Talk:Thai Union Group

How do I flag this?
Hello, this page appears to be a pitch to an investor. I don't know Wikipedia very well. How do I flag this as potentially biased? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.229.47.67 (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

IP address from Thai Union Group whitewashes this article
The latest contributions have whitewashed the referenced part about using slave labour from the article. The IP address involved is registered with the Thai Union Group. Takeaway (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

COI edits
's highly WP:COI edits have removed the references in the section "Legal issues and criticism", and added only one of them to the section "Response" which is now mainly filled with quotations taken directly from the company's website, and also some very selective quotes taken from the critical news source that was transported over to this section, making this articles seem not critical of the company at all. - Takeaway (talk) 03:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * You might want to go ahead and report the issue at WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The critical refs have been re-inserted into the correct section by WP:COI editor Eneloop Smile, but they also removed the COI tag. Re-instated COI tag: the article can still use some WP:NPOV copy-editing~. - Takeaway (talk) 11:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Thai Union Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161028163454/http://fis.com/fis/companies/details.asp?l=e&filterby=companies&=&country_id=&page=1&company_id=74903 to http://fis.com/fis/companies/details.asp?l=e&filterby=companies&=&country_id=&page=1&company_id=74903
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161028154118/http://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/thai-union-responds-to-greenpeace-challenge to http://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/thai-union-responds-to-greenpeace-challenge
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161028215058/http://sustainability.thaiunion.com/en/sustain/code-conduct to http://sustainability.thaiunion.com/en/sustain/code-conduct
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161028154327/http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/oceans/john-wests-broken-promises-20151008-0 to http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/oceans/john-wests-broken-promises-20151008-0
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161028152335/http://sustainability.thaiunion.com/en/environment/responsible-sourcing to http://sustainability.thaiunion.com/en/environment/responsible-sourcing
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161214172703/http://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=&day=14&id=88817&l=e&special=&ndb=1%20target= to http://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=&day=14&id=88817&l=e&special=&ndb=1%20target=
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161214185212/http://www.seafoodsource.com/news/foodservice-retail/thai-union-commits-to-sustainable-tuna-targets-75-percent-by-2020 to http://www.seafoodsource.com/news/foodservice-retail/thai-union-commits-to-sustainable-tuna-targets-75-percent-by-2020

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

ADVERT and COI issues
I have flagged the article. I see that numerous people over the years since the comments throughout this Talk Page were posted have attempted to purge information added by Thai Union itself. But the article hasn’t been systematically cleaned up, including an irrelevant section just on their expected future earnings. It is an WP:ADVERT and WP:COI mess. Zkidwiki (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)