Talk:Thank God I Found You/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  19:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. Please do let me know if there are more issues with the article. Novice7 (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah those book sources, I'm not saying that those authors didn't write the info, but it was only because I can't check it that I raised those issues. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  17:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Calvin, in no offense, I notice you really don't quite understand several rules for GA articles, and are failing without proper grounds. Most of the things written here are not problematic. Free images are as described, free. They don't need rationals or any such thing. Also, just because a source is not readily available for you to read does NOT make it unusable. Go to a library and look at the book, so pay for the article on line. Its as simple as that. And Nothing here is original research. Please read and understand what that means. Its if I make conslusions that are unsourced and are my own thinking. Not found buddy.-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   22:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Apart from the book sources, have all points been addressed? Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I guess so... Novice7 (talk) 04:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Passed :). You can add back in TOTP's, Wetten...dass? and the other performances. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  12:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)