Talk:Thank You Girl

Untitled
This article has been kept following this VFD-debate. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Separate sections by Lennon and McCartney
The paragraph about the composition of this song makes several claims that I take issue with, at least until persuasive evidence is presented. First of all, I've never heard any story - nor is any reference provided - that different parts of this song were composed by the individual writers. Second, it refers to the verses being written by one (which one?) and the chorus by the other (which one?), but what about the bridge? If anything, there's a different "feel" between the verse/chorus and the bridge, but that doesn't persuade me. Third, the notion that the distinction between the two writing styles is evident is decidedly NPOV. I'm going to give this a couple of weeks, and if no one else addresses this or persuades me I'm wrong (which anyone is more than welcome to do), I'm going to delete or radically alter that section. MicroProf 21:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:FromMetoYou522.jpg
Image:FromMetoYou522.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Objection to "Personnel per"
I recall "per" meaning "through, along or over" from my Latin days. Anyway, the expression "Personnel per" on this page and on the "From Me To You" page, does not sit right with me. It intrudes into the Personnel section, it's pretentious and possibly just wrong. I suggest replacing it with "(source: xxx)" plus the numbered link to reference. If someone agrees, please change it (I won't based on my opinion alone, because I'm an idiot, but two idiots could be quorate). Love, Fido x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.62.29 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)