Talk:That's What You Get

More info about the video
There's an article by MTV, which I feel gives a lot of context to the video: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1583999/20080324/paramore.jhtml However I don't really know how to reference, as I'm still learning my way around Wikipedia's tools. So would anyone feel that such information would merit inclusion in the article? --LosHavros (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Citing sources might be useful. -- neon white user page talk 23:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Someone's added "in Kerrang magazine" in the last paragraph, in the 'background' section. The quote is referenced from mtv.com, but was that exact quote the same in Kerrang magazine? If not, it needs to be removed. --LosHavros (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

UK Single
Does anyone know when this single is out in the UK??? I really like the song and I'm after it!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonni Boi (talk • contribs) 18:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Recorded Date
On Riot!'s infobox, it shows that the recorded date is btwn January and April 2007 but here it says March 2008. Is this a discrepancy? -Herenthere (Talk) 03:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Genres
Can we use genres that are sourced on front page? they are power pop emo and pop punk. if u want alt rock or pop rock to be on the singles or albums, then it should be sourced on the front page

loveyourfaith Loveyourfaith (talk) 14:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

its not power pop. music can be powerful without being power pop. and its pop punk because of the chaotic parts EG the intro

loveyourfaithLoveyourfaith (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

the genres should be pop rock, pop punk and EMO

loveyourfaithLoveyourfaith (talk) 12:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Or maybe even Emo, Pop Punk, and Alternative rock, either could be true. Emorocker777{{User:Emorocker777|Emorocker777]] (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC).

It is Alternative Rock. you can notice some Emo influences on few songs of this album, but this song is far from Emo. T.tyrael 11:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by T.tyrael (talk • contribs)

Background Section
Just to say half of the paragraph in the background section seems to have been c + p word for word from the MTV article (reference 3). I'd try to paraphrase if I wasn't doing something else, so anyone who can paraphrase or whatever, it'd be appreciated. :) londonsista  | Prod  17:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)