Talk:That Bass Tour/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 08:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Calvin999 and I am reviewing this article.


 * Review
 * is the first headlining → was the first headlining
 * of her major label → reads like a bias and fan-written perspective
 * and tour dates for Oceania, Europe, and Asia were also announced later. → with Oceanic, European and Asian dates announced afterwards.
 * to support her major-label → Same as above
 * and tickets went up for sale → and tickets were released
 * were its → as its (HP is the only one you've mentioned, so it shouldn't read plural)
 * includes fourteen → included fourteen (The tour has ended, so past tense should be being used throughout when talking about things like this)
 * Portland Tribune‍ '​s Nicole DeCosta described Trainor's dance moves during the show as being "G-rated", and said that she felt that Trainor looked laid back.[7] Ashley Lee from The Hollywood Reporter said that the show's venue was "intima[te]", and that Trainor took advantage of this.[8] → This doesn't belong in this section, these are reviews.
 * Critical reception section seems really short? Surely there are more reviews than this?
 * For such a recent tour starring such a successful and written about singer I'm surprised at the short length of this article to be honest.
 * What do you mean by "Dance to" in the Set list section?
 * Publisher parameters not needed for the references anymore

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * Summary


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

On hold for 7 days. Please try and search for more reviews or articles about this tour. I'm sure there is more than this. — Calvin999 19:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Outcome
 * I believe I fixed everything, let me know if I missed anything. I've tried adding more sources, but unfortunately the tour didn't receive that much noteworthy coverage. --Markhoris (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm so surprised. Thought it would have garnered a lot.  — Calvin999  20:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Pass or Fail: