Talk:The 13th Alley

Notability
1) A cursory internet search only returns an IMDB profile, and no other references.

2) The IMDB reference does not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM

3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.

4) The film is widely distributed, but it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.

5) The film is not historically notable.

6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. (Yes the five years has not passed, but really, do you think this film will be on any of thoise lists?)

7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.

10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

11) The film does not in any way, shape or form represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.

I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 16:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Should be deleted. JEMZ1995 (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

==== I've removed the reception and references section. Three random reviews from an internet forum does not seem notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia. Let's wait for a professional review before we have a reception section. Benjaminlobato (talk) 19:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)