Talk:The 15:17 to Paris

Deletion
I don't understand this deletion. Unlike the other opinions there, this one is of a fellow working for a non-notable thing. With the others, we can better understand the nature of the commentator's status by their in-lined organizational article. Here we are bereft of that. And "but you can click through and learn it" is not a sufficient answer. It is two words. Seriously. You can click through and see for whom the other critics work for, but we don't as a result delete their publication names, and only list their names. --2603:7000:2143:8500:1D36:6FB6:FDDA:9EB2 (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * At the end of the day, I agree with Mathglot - it is a non-RS, just a self-published blog, and should therefore be removed. --2603:7000:2143:8500:94D2:447:CF44:F53 (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)