Talk:The 23rd Psalm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  00:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review soon one of my favorite Lost episodes.  R uby2010  comment!  00:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * One dab link needs fixing ✅
 * The lead has a few minor problems; I fixed them here
 * The episode has an overall theme of redemption, and was written in a way it paralleled "Deus Ex Machina", the episode where the Nigerian airplane was first introduced.  Not sure what you're trying to say here. The episode paralleled "Deus Ex Machina"? Make it more clear please
 * Find the proper wikilink for redemption
 * Italicize Entertainment Weekly (it's a magazine) ✅

Just a few minor fixes needed above, and the article will be good to go. I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  00:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Loks good. Pass for GA. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  20:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)