Talk:The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T.

Untitled
FYI - Tommy Rettig had a piano playing double in the film - then 10 year old Michel Rubini who would go on to be famous in his own right. He is also one of the boys held by Doctor T. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparky (talk • contribs) 21:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

In addition, Man Or Astro-man? samples a line from this movie in the song Happy Fingers on the Album "Your Weight On The Moon" (track 8). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.251.252.13 (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

What, no mention of the problems plagueing this movie, or its somewhat dismal performance in theaters? I remember hearing that all the child extras were quite displeased at having to sit and be quiet and pretend to play piano.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

The "See My Vest" number from the Simpson's was much more obviously inspired by the song "Be My Guest" which is the official song of Walt Disney World. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.251.148 (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

"constructed a piano so large that it requires Bart and 499 other enslaved boys (the aforementioned 5,000 fingers) in order to play it."

I'm guessing it's 4,999? Haven't seen it myself so I won't edit it. 81.174.148.164 (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's 5,000 fingers, not 5,000 boys. Clevelander96 (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Spam
Removed link to Bunny concerto -- blatant spam -- had nothing to do with the movie, nor Dr Seuss. Just the usual, musicians peddling their wares everywhere and anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.50.34 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

"Talk to Frank"
This sounds like nonsense, or someone making connections that aren't there. This should be deleted. Verlaine76 (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150123051839/http://www.cherryred.co.uk/el-content.asp?type=El+-+Media to http://www.cherryred.co.uk/el-content.asp?type=El+-+Media

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC) –  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  02:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 16 December 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. After 19 days and a relisting, it would appear to be good to insert a full stop at the end of the title as proposed. The opposer is correct in describing potential ways this might confuse readers; however, I see no place in this article where such concerns are as yet warranted. Also, we should be careful that we don't underestimate our readers' abilities to figure things out. Don't see a lot of consistency on Wikipedia, nor does there appear to be a lot in the way of guideline help, so we go with the opening credits found at the website noted by the nom. Happy New Year to All! (closed by page mover)  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there 01:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T → The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. – Per on-screen form of the title in the film's opening credits which specifically indicates "T.", not "T"; the posters are inconsistent, with some displaying "T." and others displaying "T". Screenshots of the opening credits may be accessed at annyas.com/screenshots/updates/5000-fingers-of-dr-t-1953/. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 01:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943  (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * What does WP:MOS say about dots after Mr. T? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It all depends on the specific case. The character Mr. T clearly does not use a dot after "T" and all references to him in titles of films, TV series, individual episodes, comics or any other medium, are without a dot to his name. The dot is likewise missing from the name of the title character in Dr. T & the Women. On the other hand, Dr. Seuss' character, Dr. T., is indicated with a dot in the title of the film (available for viewing online and in above-mentioned screenshots of the opening credits). There is no specific MOS guideline that counsels against using a dot in a character's name if such a dot appears on-screen. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 15:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose move on the grounds that ending the title of an article with a "." character is kind of confusing and annoying, so that if there's an equally-acceptable alternative without the ".", it should be used instead... AnonMoos (talk) 15:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Support Based on a cursory scan of Google results for the movie, I didn't get a sense of a clear majority usage. In the face of inconsistent usage, it makes sense to default to the title the work itself uses. I don't find "confusing and annoying" a valid reason for opposing this move, considering that the punctuation is entirely correct.--Aervanath (talk) 22:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * It would mean that you would have to add a period to the end of every mention of the title of the movie in the article. The period in "Dr." doesn't really cause problems, but the period after "T" isn't neutralized by being part of a well-known abbreviation, and so might be confusing.  And of course if the title occurs at the end of a sentence, then the two periods in a row would have to be reduced to one, etc... AnonMoos (talk) 13:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The nomination simply proposes that the article's main title header represents this film's title in the same manner as it appears in the film's credits. Any orthographic uncertainties are expected to be resolved by redirects and common sense. Mr T redirects to Mr. T; Dr Who and Dr. Who redirect to Doctor Who; Douglas Fairbanks Jr, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr, Douglas Fairbanks Junior, Douglas Fairbanks Jnr and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. redirect to Douglas Fairbanks Jr.; Dr. T and the Women, Dr T and the Women, Doctor T and the Women and Dr. T & The Women redirect to Dr. T & the Women and so on.
 * As of this writing, The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. [with the period] redirects to the currently existing main header, The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T [without the period]. The nomination proposes a reversal of these two forms. We've come to a consensus, for example, regarding the absence within main headers of a comma before WP:JR for names of people (though not names of fictional characters whose comma appears on-screen as part of the title). However, within cast lists, names are credited inconsistently, with or without the comma, and can be linked through redirects either way, depending on whether or not the on-screen billing contains a comma.
 * In the case at hand, if there is a need to refer to this title in the middle of a sentence, the period may be ether omitted or, since it would be part of the italicized title, retained within the context of the sentence. Finally, if the title is mentioned at the end of a sentence, a single period would suffice, either within the italicized link: T.]]" or outside the italicized link: T]]". All linked deviations would flow to the article via redirects created to encompass any possible form. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 16:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * In other words, you're proposing to create inconsistency between the article title and the text of the article to avoid difficulties after the proposed move. Wouldn't it be better to avoid both inconsistency and difficulties by just not moving in the first place? (That's my question...) AnonMoos (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Since the period is part of the on-screen title and would be italicized along with the rest of the elements of the title, the most consistent arrangement would be to retain the period if this title comes to be mentioned within the middle of a sentence. The italicized title with the italicized period should mitigate the peculiar appearance of a mid-sentence period.
 * The same reasoning would apply to the potential double period if this title should ever be mentioned at the end of a sentence in an article. The first (italicized) period would be part of the title and the second (standard) period would indicate end of sentence. The redirects would still be there in the event an editor links the title and publishes it with single periods or no periods. &mdash;Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 19:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Adding a music fact
Hello, I am new to Wikipedia editing and wanted to start here, with a film that I have always cherished. I am going to add a deleted music verse from a song featured in the film. Thank you kindly! Alisha Asu wiki (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * If you mean adding song lyrics, that could be a copyright violation. AnonMoos (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)