Talk:The Age of Plastic/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед (talk · contribs) 07:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

With all the issues address, here's the summary of your work:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose was fixed and I believe it is satisfactory in its current state.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The references are placed in appropriate templates and are citing reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The text covers all major aspects and doesn't contain trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * All of the information is fairly presented.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The two covers used in the article are properly licensed. Additional images would be unnecessary.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well, after a few suggestion of mine which you successfully completed, I'm happy to announce that this article is upgraded to GA.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, after a few suggestion of mine which you successfully completed, I'm happy to announce that this article is upgraded to GA.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)