Talk:The Allen Group

Speedy delete
I added the g11 speedy to this article because it appears to be little more than promotional material for the company. Regarding notablity, the article states that it has notable clients, but does not say how the company itself is notable. Having notable clients does not make one notable. Notability does not automatically transfer. If it did, anyone could claim notability. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The company is notable because it has been written about by reliable sources. There is no reason to characterize the article as spam. See the coverage at http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080529/NEWS01/805290317/1002 for example, which I added to a previous version of the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Allen_Group&oldid=219442646 (and then someone removed it). --Eastmain (talk) 07:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Just because one newspaper wrote about it doesn't automatically qualify it as notable. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy is only if there is nothing to indicate importance, or where there is no practical way to rewrite the article to be descriptive rather than promotional. see WP:CSD. DGG (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Allen Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216164552/http://sourcebook.sddt.com:80/source/company.cfm?BusinessCategory_ID=93&Company_ID=4944 to http://sourcebook.sddt.com/Source/company.cfm?BusinessCategory_ID=93&Company_ID=4944

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)