Talk:The Amazing Spider-Man (1990 video game)

Take 6
After you get through "All That and Jaws Too," "Castle Entrance," "Puzzle Room," "The Pits," and "Torture Chamber," you will reach "Take 6," which is the last Take as can be determined by examining the rooms file. Here you will go back to "Weighting Room" and "Mission Control," entering the parts previously unreachable. The next room after these is "Air-Locked." What is beyond this is unknown, but examining the room file suggests either "Planet Fall" or "Video Code." "Mysterio's End" cannot be far after these.

Behind Bars
You've got to enter the right side of "Behind Bars," flip down the hat of the drunk at the top right, and then move the top floor to the right. Then enter the left side and hit the button opening the door to the drunks while quickly dropping below the door that will move in to block you. You must flip down the hats of all the drunks in Take 4 except the two at the bottom right of "Behind Bars." Then the boxes at the top of "Cheers" will be gone and you can go up into "Take 5."

Hints
I'm working, screen by screen on creating a map for this game, which I plan to release to the WCommons. I'm up to

Behind Bars

right now, and can't figure out

How to flip the doors in order to get to the drunks.

Help?

Fair use rationale for Image:The-Amazing-Spider-Man-Game-Box-Cover.jpg
Image:The-Amazing-Spider-Man-Game-Box-Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 1 January 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Withdraw by nominator - This seems to have gained consensus as the way to disambiguate handheld versions and therefore I withdraw this RM as unnecessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

– Proper disambiguation scheme per WP:NCVGDAB, due to the existence of The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 video game). The first game should be disambiguated by either Amiga or Commodore 64, I admit not knowing which to use so if anyone has a better suggestion I am all ears. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:05, 1 January 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.  Megan B....   It’s all coming to me till the end of time  15:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The Amazing Spider-Man (1990 video game) → The Amazing Spider-Man (1990 Amiga video game)
 * The Amazing Spider-Man (handheld video game) → The Amazing Spider-Man (1990 Game Boy video game)


 * definitely agree. i think Amiga is fine since it uses better graphics and has a general higher quality then the c64 version. Rikieboy1 (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose moving The Amazing Spider-Man (1990 video game), which is about a game that came out on multiple platforms so it makes no sense to have a title that is about one platform. OK with the second proposed move, which distinguishes it over the the first game anyway. FOARP (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It has to specify SOME platform, as otherwise it's overly vague and can also encompass the Game Boy game released in the same year. Amiga is just a compromise for the most prominent platform it was released on. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Disagree. As it was released on two platforms, neither one of them is a good disambiguator. Did the 1990 Game Boy game at The Amazing Spider-Man (handheld video game) (it seems to be a completely different game) receive a similar level of reliable source coverage? If not, no move is required, just a hatnote. Andrewa (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What about by developer? It may not be the standard, but picking one platform the game was on, when it was on multiple, doesn't really fit what the purpose of disambiguation is meant to solve.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Andrewa (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)