Talk:The Apple (1980 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:APPLETHE-box hires dvd.jpg
Image:APPLETHE-box hires dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Linking
Julie Collins, David Tate and others were not in this movie. Do not add links to these people. Also, there is no reason to add links where there are no Wikipedia articles. If you plan to create articles for these people, do so, and then come back and link them. See Red link for more information. Ground Zero | t 01:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Production and release
According to a legal declaration signed by Menahem Golan in 2008, The Apple was produced in Berlin in 1979, with the material being legally acquired on April 9, 1979, so any 1978 release date must be an error.

There's a couple of references to the "Paradise Day" scene as "uncut." This scene has never been in a publicly released version of movie, so this is not only wrong, but I see the same terminology being used on other sites which likely used Wikipedia as a source. This is a "cut" or "discarded" scene, and all references to it should note that correctly. Dorrk (talk) 00:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Vanity Page
Why does a film no one ever saw, and should never have been made, have a Wikipedia page longer than the script for "Titanic"? Does it really rate a blow-by-blow account? The only noteworthy aspects of it are that it is execrable and unwatchable, and thankfully never got wide exposure. Also, while it is obvious that English is the page's original author's second language, someone should tell them to use the word "unused" instead of "uncut." Gil gosseyn (talk) 09:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)