Talk:The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Three images used: File:Archaeology of Ritual and Magic.jpg Fair use image of the book cover. File:Swinside (p4160146).jpg Commons-hosted cc-by-sa. File:Sator Square at Oppède.jpg Commons-hosted GNU cc-by-sa.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I didn't realize until halfway through that I had already read this during its peer review. The article easily meets the GA criteria. If you would like a more detailed review or other perspectives, you can nominate this for Featured status. Otherwise, I look forward to seeing your next GA. maclean (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * As this is article about a book, I have placed it in the Literature section. maclean (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Three images used: File:Archaeology of Ritual and Magic.jpg Fair use image of the book cover. File:Swinside (p4160146).jpg Commons-hosted cc-by-sa. File:Sator Square at Oppède.jpg Commons-hosted GNU cc-by-sa.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I didn't realize until halfway through that I had already read this during its peer review. The article easily meets the GA criteria. If you would like a more detailed review or other perspectives, you can nominate this for Featured status. Otherwise, I look forward to seeing your next GA. maclean (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * As this is article about a book, I have placed it in the Literature section. maclean (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * As this is article about a book, I have placed it in the Literature section. maclean (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)