Talk:The Arrival (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GRAPPLE   X  00:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * I made most of the changes you suggested (the plot was written by someone else, so I have that excuse!) And which part about Peter being kept awake is confusing? Sorry, I just don't see which part you are referring to. :) Ruby2010   talk  02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I made most of the changes you suggested (the plot was written by someone else, so I have that excuse!) And which part about Peter being kept awake is confusing? Sorry, I just don't see which part you are referring to. :) Ruby2010   talk  02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I made most of the changes you suggested (the plot was written by someone else, so I have that excuse!) And which part about Peter being kept awake is confusing? Sorry, I just don't see which part you are referring to. :) Ruby2010   talk  02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.|Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.
 * I'm happy with the improvements. Passed.
 * See my reply above :) Ruby2010   talk  02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Re-reading it, I think I misinterpreted what was meant in that sentence, so oops on my part. GRAPPLE   X  11:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Ruby2010   talk  14:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.|Going to stick this on hold until the first point above is seen to. I know you're a pretty prompt editor so this is probably going to be little more than a formality, but I'd rather not rubber-stamp a pass when it can shored up first.
 * I'm happy with the improvements. Passed.
 * See my reply above :) Ruby2010   talk  02:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Re-reading it, I think I misinterpreted what was meant in that sentence, so oops on my part. GRAPPLE   X  11:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Ruby2010   talk  14:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Ruby2010   talk  14:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)