Talk:The Attic Door

Untitled
I am currently sending an email to "permissions-commons AT wikimedia DOT org" and "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" with the proper permissions from the writer-director and owner of the copyright, Danny Daneau from his company Nightlight Pictures LLC. Theatticdoor (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Confirming that permission has been sent to the OTRS. Email Subject: The Attic Door Copyright Permissions Permission granted from copyright owner.

Theatticdoor (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Did it have a screening in September, or not?
https://newburyportfilmfestival.withoutabox.com/films/TheAtticDoor  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No we did not. I have no idea why they have our film on their withoutabox page. The film is still awaiting it's premiere. Theatticdoor (talk) 01:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay. It would have been a good thing had it happened. I do suggest you do an immediate copy and paste of the entire article to User:Theatticdoor/sandbox and keep working on it, as it may not have enough currently sourcable notability to survive the AfD.... and I'd hate to see it be deleted after our work on it.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Copied successfully to sandbox. Thanks for all your help. Theatticdoor (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Glad to help. Often times even an article with weak notability may be accepted becuase it looks good and "feels" worthy of Wiki. I myself have defended articles at AfD that had a clumsy feel to them and were poorly sourced... sent to AfD specifiaclly because the perception of notability was absent from the article... articles that with the slightest bit of research were easy to source for notability and impprove. It's difficult to see an editor defend an article with "Its notable. The sources are online. The article doesn't have to have the notability included"... which are all techinically correct statements. But if an article has the "good look", it is far less likley to be questioned in the first place. Now I hope your article survives... but it may not, as the film is still waiting to be seen and reviewed. Working in and keeping a copy in your workspace is always a good idea. And never be hesitant to ask for advice or input. You are not here alone...  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh... and go to your sandbox and remove the "categories" from the bottom of the held copy. Those only belong if its on mainspace. You need not delete them... simply remove the brackets so they are no longer category links. That way you'll still have them for later.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Theatticdoor (talk) 14:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)