Talk:The Bacon Cookbook/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ha  dg  er  18:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I read this article, and it is a very good article. Thank you! Cirt (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * This article definitely is prose and follows the manual of style, and I hardly found any grammar errors. Good job!
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * This article has reliable and verifiable sources, good references, and no original research. Good job!
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * This article covers important topics about the book and doesn't get off-topic. Good job!
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This article contains no opinions but instead contains facts about opinions, doesn't contain words to avoid, and follows the rest of the neutral point of view policy. Good job!
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * I checked the history and saw that there are no edit wars or any other types of conflict that would harm the article. Good job!
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Although there is only one image, it is used in a good place. Good job!
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations! This article passed as a Good Article. Good job! -- Ha dg  er  18:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)