Talk:The Bart Wants What It Wants/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * There is one deadlink

More to come  R uby2010   comment!  21:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Wikilink Rainier Wolfcastle in lead
 * You can remove Canada in the lead (I think most readers know where Toronto is; wikilink the city for those less informed) ;)
 * Wikilink characters in polt (Homer etc)
 * The plot seems a little disconnected (why did Homer steal the Olympic torch?) The section could use some expansion (it's still below the basic word limits)
 * "even though it Canada is not mentioned"
 * "features the Simpsons first travel to Canada" -> the Simpsons'
 * "It was written by Frink and, according to Selman, the line became very popular with the staff..." I think you should change the first "It" to "the line" and change second "the line" to "it"
 * Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
 * Refs 2 and 10: page number?
 * Remove caps on ref 8

On hold for seven days. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  21:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good except: Refs 2 and 10: page number?  R uby2010   comment!  16:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The refs were added by another editor. I've asked him if he could provide with the page numbers, but he hasn't responded yet, so there's really nothing I can do for now unfortunately. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Scorpion0422 likely didn't include the page numbers because they weren't available. Page numbers are not always available on Newsbank. And besides, page numbers are optional per Citing sources. Theleftorium (talk) 23:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm satisfied then. Pass for GA. Nice work,  R uby2010   comment!  03:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)