Talk:The Battle of China

Intention to remove picture

 * THE FAKE OF NANKING on Youtube

Why do you remove so important a fact? Tell us your thought.--Hare-Yukai 10:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Read WP:V. The criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia is not fact or truth, but verifiability. Not to mention that it's not even factual, so naturally it can't be verifiable. -- Миборовский 05:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Please diccuss here
I have made a Requests for page protection for this article. Please discuss in this talk page.(not in article page.)Penpen0216 04:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * This picture was taken by a Chinese staff working for Hearst media. It appeared in Oct.4 1937 issue of LIFE and was reprinted in LIFE at War (which I have). Frank Capra has nothing to do with this. And it was not taken as "part of the the Battle of China" in 1943 like Hare-Yukai likes to repeat. He apparently knows nothing about this and continues vandalizing this page with incorrect info and duplications. And no, hare-yukai is not Japanese. He's some confused kid from Taiwan. And he likes to repeatdly post the "Fake of Nanking" fan-made video with absolutely no documentation whatsoever as a legitimate source, which is not allowed on wikipedia either. Blueshirts 07:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you believe this article? zh:王小亭,ja:王小亭 It is being written like this there. This picture was taken by 王小亭 in the Shanghai, and it was presented through the Hearst media for the world., 王小亭 was in the zh:申報 (it was being under controlled by the Nationalist community.) ,and he transferred to the Shanghai branch of the Hearst media, and he chased the National army, furthermore, he became to belong the exclusively movie engineer of the National army.--Hare-Yukai 02:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

"the Chinese communists are never explicitly mentioned"
Actually, I seem to remember a scene in the film of Mao giving a speech when the narrator talked about "the entire nation rallied to drive off the Japanese" or somesuch. -- Миборовский 03:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Introduction
The song at the very beginning of the film (as hosted on the archive.org site, at least) is definitely some sort of rendition of the March of the Volunteers. Should that be mentioned in the article? AustinZ (talk) 18:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Research has not been done properly. Tibet and Manchurian were never a part of china but it's sad that how can people make such a fake film —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.63.6.93 (talk) 08:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

the Americans needed Tibetan Permission to transport war supplies across to China..which they didnt get!! If﻿ Tibet was part of China why does an ally of the chinese need permission from a third party!!!!!

this﻿ is when china was an american allie, its a pretty good propaganda