Talk:The Beast Below/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 20:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Will get to this weekend.  Ruby  2010/  2013  20:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * The plot summary is a bit long, but I understand more detail is often needed for complicated episodes. Is there anything trivial that can be taken out or reworded?
 * I noticed this too but there was nothing major I could cut out as everything is sort of connected to the reason behind what is going on with the ship, though I did remove some things. If you can think of any other suggestions please tell me. Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * "Gillan put in some of her own wonder at the set into the scene where Amy admires the street for the first time.[8]" I see what you're trying to say here, but this could be rephrased a little to make it more clear
 * Reworded. Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * "IGN's Matt Wales was more mixed..." You mean his opinion was mixed?
 * Fixed. Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * "He considered it it imaginative..."
 * Fixed. Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Refs: Make sure they're all lowercase in the titles.
 * Fixed. Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Why do you have publishers for some of the refs, but not for others?
 * Fixed, I think (Metro seemed to be the only one). Glimmer721  talk  01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

The article looks great overall. Just address the above issues and it will be good to go!
 * Looks good! Happy to pass this one.  Ruby  2010/  2013  02:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)