Talk:The Beresford/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 22:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Happy to review this one. Bruxton (talk) 22:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Questions

 * Might need to change "Each grouping is flanked by brick pilasters and are topped by a triangular broken" to "is" instead of are.
 * I am not familiar with "infilled" in the sentence "The arches were originally open-air openings but were infilled with windows" but it is a word so probably ok.
 * Cooperative conversion - "two years on renovating" probably remove the word "on"
 * Seven images, sadly none of the interior or the lobby
 * Thanks for the review @Bruxton. I've fixed all of these now. – Epicgenius (talk) 23:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * If I have not said it before, it is a pleasure to read and review your articles. I will certainly review a few more before this latest drive is thorough. This article is in MOS:ORDER, well illustrated (interior would be nice) and has high quality sources. I try to imagine having a unit like the ones described in the articlem "Many of the apartments were duplex units that originally spanned multiple stories". I like your use of notes. Bruxton (talk) 00:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)