Talk:The Bill/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am re-requesting assessment of The Bill. The article was removed from the good article list but that was some 4 or 5 years ago and I think the article has changed a lot in that time. It is a well written article because it is clear and concise and is well explained.

It is factually correct and everything that I can see could be challenged is supported by a reference. Anything that is unreferenced is removed by us editors who watch the page almost immediately. It is broad in it's coverage, for example it covers the fact that the programme was axed in Scotland, but does not go into any unnecessary detail about it. At the same time the article is not in any way biased. There has been no edit warring going on with this article, in fact there are days when no changes are made.

I would therefore like to request that this article is re-assessed. --5 albert square (talk) 22:19, 17 October 2009 (UTC)