Talk:The Blue Bird (1976 film)

NPOV
It's a pity for the article, that it lacks even a plot description, containing only a bunch of unsourced and biased statements on its production surroundings. Even if these statements are true, they should be clarified, i. e. for example, critics should be specified explicitly, instead of saying abstractly, that "it was widely panned by critics". Cmapm 23:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it better now? Did you help improve the article herein? -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

✅ -- both issues (plot and specific critics) are addressed/added. -- AstroU (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blue bird 1976 movie poster.jpg
Image:Blue bird 1976 movie poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)