Talk:The Boat Race 1883/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 16:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Today's Boat Race

Background

 * Similar problem to other articles - explain who the Blues are, and also link the 1877 "dead heat" race (hopefully which will eventually be an FA and definitely worth linking)
 * Fixed. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "Woodgate also briefly coached the Light Blues" - do we know when?
 * The same year. Noted.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * " three times in quick succession the occupant differed" - maybe "switched" instead of "differed"
 * I think I'll go with "was replaced" as "switched" sounds dreadfully American..... The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh don't get me started, I spent an hour at work today with a Windows 8.1 installation that just would not switch the keyboard out of US English and put it on UK. Anyway, I digress.... Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "The race featured two non-British participants:" - shouldn't that be a semicolon instead of a colon?
 * I think a colon is just dandy. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Since that Terry-Thomasesque turn of phrase brought a grin, I'll let it stay. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Race

 * "Commencing at 5.39pm, the start of the race descended into chaos: darkness was falling" - might be easier to say "The race started at 5.39pm but descended into chaos due to darkness falling" (then put the next bit in a separate sentence)
 * Rephrased a little bit. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "from the starter Searle, who had fulfilled that position since the 1840 race" - I think the "who had fulfilled...." is better suited in "Background" rather than here, where the participants are described
 * Rejigged. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Summary

 * That's it - on hold. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * C'est ca, thanks again. I appreciate all the reviews and appreciate someone who genuinely cares about improving the encyclopaedic content of Wikipedia.  All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Now if I didn't know any better, I'd swear that was a disguised dig at some other editor who doesn't do as much article work as we would like ..... anyway, passed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)