Talk:The Boat Race 1905/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 19:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * No copyvios detected.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "...and he was replaced by novice P. H. Thomas, unfit having recently returned from Africa.[10]" - shouldn't this be "who was unfit, having recently returned from Africa?"-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Follows MOS standards.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Has a well-formatted reference section.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * Adequate citations to reliable sources.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * All content is verifiable.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * No undue detail, the article is quite short, actually.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * Stays focused on the subject.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral, balanced presentation.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * The entire history consists of three edits, so yes, quite stable.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)-- 3family6  ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * One image is public domain, and the other is under Creative Commons.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Images are relevant with suitable captions.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: Just one problematic sentence.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Resolved. Pass.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Pass or Fail:

Thank you, I believe I've addressed your concern, but of course, let me know if there's anything else I can adjust. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * All set.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)