Talk:The Boat Race 1920/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

I've missed out on too many Boat Races! ☯ Jag  uar  ☯ 18:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, there's about 40 left! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

 * The lead summarises the article well, but it doesn't mention why there were no Boat Races from 1915-1919. Don't worry, I know it's because of WWI (and the reader can assume that too), but it would be nice to add as per the 'broadness in coverage' part of the criteria
 * I'm not sure when you read this article, but I see "As a result of the First World War, this was the first race for six years" in the lead. In any case, hopefully it suffices.  The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * "during the conflict, at least 42 Blues were killed," - are these both Oxford and Cambridge blues combined?
 * Yes. Attempted to clarify... The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * "The Light Blues also took part in the Inter Allied Peace Regatta in Paris" - when was this event? The same year?
 * Yes, 1919. Clarified. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * "For the twelfth year the umpire was old Etonian Frederick I. Pitman" - is it neutral to call him old, or is 'Old Etonian' a term?
 * Old Etonian is common terminology for someone who attended Eton College... see, for example, List of Old Etonians born in the 20th century.... The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your review, I note you say these are "Initial" so I look forward to addressing any further concerns you may have! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

On hold
Just the minor stuff, otherwise the article (along with the other hundred Boat Races) is looking great. I realise that this is the shortest review I have ever done, but I have to point out that there is virtually nothing wrong (prose wise) with this article. As with any Boat Race, the content is all there and the references are in order. Can't wait to review more! Please keep them coming! ☯ Jag  uar  ☯ 21:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Close - promoted
Thank you for your fast response here, I usually put "initial" comments out of force of habit, but I'm glad to say that this article meets the GA criteria. Good work! Just 40 left? ☯ Jag  uar  ☯ 16:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)