Talk:The Boat Race 1927/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Looks good – will do a thorough review later this evening. 97198 (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Very well written, concise and easy to understand.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All claims are referenced, and all references appear to be reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All main aspects of the race are covered in good detail. The background section is especially useful for non-fans.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No neutrality problems.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Good use of images, both of which are appropriately licensed.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Great work as usual. I made a few minor changes (feel free to revert any you disagree with) and I'm otherwise unable to fault anything in the article. GA it is! 97198 (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Nah, looks great. Thanks for the review, the tweaks and picking up on the error too!  The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Nah, looks great. Thanks for the review, the tweaks and picking up on the error too!  The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)