Talk:The Boat Race 1933/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 12:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments

 * Lead
 * "umpired by former rower Herbert Aylward Game" – I have definitely bleated before – reviewing the 1931 article – about the use of the false title in articles on British subjects – tabloidese, in my view. There's another false title later, for E. P. Evans, But, as I have reluctantly conceded, this not a point that stands in the way of promotion to GA.
 * I'm shocked at myself. At least I've tried to fix these both.  The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Yet another fine addition to a prodigious series of articles. I can see there's a backlog of articles in the series building up at GAN and will return to them soon, but two Boat Race articles a day is the maximum recommended dose for the average sedentary adult. –  Tim riley  talk    12:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much, I really appreciate your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)