Talk:The Boat Race 1935/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments
Messrs Bourne (twice), Payne and Evans are given false titles, but I have bored you on that topic elsewhere, and it's entirely up to you. The OED doesn't hyphenate "outperform", and in the Race section you link both Times and Guardian a second time each, and tell us for the second time that Evans was writing in the latter. Nothing to frighten the horses there, and accordingly:

Review summary

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'll look at another on the list later today if time permits. –  Tim riley  talk    13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)