Talk:The Boat Race 1938/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 10:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments
Shall we mention anarthrous prenominal modifiers for variety's sake (Messrs Rickett and Thomson)? That apart, The Times report hyphenates both the incidences of "first-rate". I can't work out why you link from the notes here to the article on the relevant paper at every mention (four links to The Observer, three to The Manchester Guardian) but it doesn't appear to breach any MoS rule, so to each his own.

Review summary

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'll try to fit another in later today.  Tim riley  talk    10:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks Tim, adjusted accordingly. In my mind, those references could be looked at in any order so linking the work each time seems like a simple courtesy to our readers who don't then have to hunt back through the refs to find the one that is linked.  The Rambling Man (talk) 11:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)