Talk:The Book of est/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: two found and fixed. --Jezhotwells (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

ON hold for seven days, just one minor matter to be addressed. --Jezhotwells (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Thanks for sorting that minor issue out. I am now happy to pass this as a good article, congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Thanks very much for doing the GA Review. The above recommended helpful suggestions are now all ✅. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 11:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made one copy-edit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References, check out, but I am not happy with the bare LOCN & OCLC numbers (refs #14/15/16/17) Can these be expanded, eg Library of Congress Catalog Record. Just so that the reader can figure out what they are. ✅
 * Other references check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Response to GA Review
 * Response to GA Review