Talk:The Borderers

Thought Crimes?
"There's been a lot of unenclyclopedic content added."

I've seen this before. Things get rejected because they offend the subculture, even though they are clearly facts.--GwydionM (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You may not like this, but Wikipedia is not actually concerned primarily with facts but with verifiability. Being an encyclopedia, it is not a publisher of original thought; all content and opinion must originate in reliable sources. By policy (see WP:PRIMARY), primary sources are only acceptable if they are reputably published, and then only with care; it is certainly not appropriate to base an entire section on such a source, and even less acceptable to engage in editorial disputes in article space (this talk page is the proper forum for that).
 * I have removed the section in question, but since it contains potentially useful information, I will reproduce it here. Hairy Dude (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)