Talk:The Boxer (The Chemical Brothers song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "It charted in Spain, Ireland and the US Dance Singles Sales chart" - It charted in Spain, Ireland and in the US Dance Singles Sales chart
 * " was donated to Good for Nothing's 50/50 Make or Break in 2011" - it might be best to mention that Good for Nothing are a charity group here
 * "It also had a one-week stay on the Spanish Albums Chart at number 17 in the week of July 31 and at number 15 on the Billboard's US " - already linked twice
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good work. I couldn't find anything worthy enough to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now as it meets the criteria. JAG UAR   12:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you so so much for reviewing my article. I wish you all the best. Beyoncetan (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)