Talk:The Callback Queen

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... --Thununder (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Also embedded the following permission at original website "The text of this webpage ( http://www.webcitation.org/64lXI12iE) is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or over texts)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thununder (talk • contribs) 19:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The release notice you mention is not found anywhere on that link. The link _does_ include a copyright notice tho. In case of copyvio, the onus is on you to prove it was released. Why not just type up a non copy vio plot summary? Gaijin42 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The font is the same colour as the background, highlight the very bottom of the page and you will see it. Done for aesthetic reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thununder (talk • contribs) 19:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * All I see is "© Powertrip Productions. All enquiries welcomed." Gaijin42 (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

It's beneath that, you need to highlight everything below that with your cursor to reveal it as it's in the same colour as the background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thununder (talk • contribs) 20:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I have done so, and also looked at the HTML. It is not there in the link you provided (or does not appear to all users). Gaijin42 (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

It's on www.thecallbackqueen.com now, although maybe not if you're looking at a cached version? Thununder (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I see it on the main website now. Note that the purpose of the webcite link you have posted above is to store a cached copy. Based on that note, I think the text can be re-added, however I do have some concerns about the license, as it is ambiguous what it applies to. Are the taglines of the movie now CC licened? How about the video? etc. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I had done the steps in the reverse order, I got that webcite cached link before adding the text release to the webpage. I have since clarified usage (text of synopsis and credits) and got a new webcite link with that permission cached on it. Hope that resolves it and the plot synopsis can be readded. Thanks for the assistance. Thununder (talk) 20:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

copyvio/delete
I have deleted the offending text, and removed the copyvio notifications. AFTER the OTRS request goes through, the text could be re-added. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)