Talk:The Caravan

Untitled
1. The copy pasted material is from the magazine website (under the column About us and in History of the Caravan). The material is open to the general public.

2. The tone of the article is only descriptive and not neutral.

Miss remiss (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Caravan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130625203205/http://www.afaqs.com:80/media/story/37457_Delhi-Presss-bold-gamble to http://www.afaqs.com/media/story/37457_Delhi-Presss-bold-gamble

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

'Controversies' section.
Why does the 'controversies' section report on the initiation of two defamation suits, from 2011 and 2015, while not providing any information at all as to how the cases were concluded? Is the Indian legal process really that slow? 86.143.231.214 (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Because of extreme political divide and The Caravan being a left (ideologically) magazine, the writers on Wikipedia generally avoid criticizing it. Also, the criminal defamation suits are on-going. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4056:195:38B:8038:F62D:B6EB:1346 (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Why is the designation of the magazine as a left leaned one being edited out again and again without proper explaination? The founders, the authors, the articles, the advocacy are textbook left-wing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidit Bhosale (talk • contribs) 14:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , you need to provide reliable secondary sources which describe The Caravan as "left wing". We can not publish unverified assertions based on personal analyses. In addition, I've removed the "fact check" from The Times of India which is not considered reliable on issues related to politics and the government.  Tayi Arajakate  Talk 15:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)