Talk:The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

Potential problems for the GA nomination
After chancing on this article by chance, I noticed a few potential problems: These are some of the more obvious problems I noted. Feel free to contact me should you need any clarifications or help. Good luck for the GA nomination!--Lionratz (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) The Plot section is too long. MOS:Film states that summary should be "between 400 and 700 words".
 * 2) Many references are not inline citations, which is one of GA requirements. (criteria 2b)
 * 3) "File:Dawn treader.jpg" has not met non-free image criteria. (It is too big, and it has only one non-free rationale even though it is used for two articles)
 * 4) (My personal opinion) I think there is an over-citation problem in certain sections.


 * Just going to say it didn't see some of these problems, then I noticed the date of the above.


 * 1) The plot section is 591 words (I haven't read it though)
 * 2) I converted the only extlink I found into a ref. There are some bare urls which could be converted (is this a GA requirement?)
 * 3) I removed the image from Dawn Treader it needs a separate non-free rationale there. I've tagged it undefined, I might be able to do this myself later.


 * Edgepedia (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Just another comment that left justified images should be after the first paragraph in a section reading the MOS Images, but I don't this as a GA requirement. Edgepedia (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230075908/http://www.carrieunderwoodofficial.com/us/news/carrie-co-writes-records-title-song-chronicles-narnia to http://www.carrieunderwoodofficial.com/us/news/carrie-co-writes-records-title-song-chronicles-narnia
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216235842/http://newsroom.mtv.com/2010/12/14/golden-globe-nominations-music/ to http://newsroom.mtv.com/2010/12/14/golden-globe-nominations-music/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110116101842/http://phoenixfilmcriticssociety.org/article/135/12-14-10-2010-phoenix-film-critics-society-awards-nominations.html to http://phoenixfilmcriticssociety.org/article/135/12-14-10-2010-phoenix-film-critics-society-awards-nominations.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714082001/http://www.adg.org/?content=cm&section=7 to http://www.adg.org/?art=nominee_10
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110206172326/http://www.visualeffectssociety.com/system/files/15/files/ves-awards-nominees-2011-final.pdf to http://www.visualeffectssociety.com/system/files/15/files/ves-awards-nominees-2011-final.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430224049/http://scifimafia.com/2011/02/37th-annual-saturn-award-nominations/ to http://scifimafia.com/2011/02/37th-annual-saturn-award-nominations/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824011736/http://www.nationalmovieawards.com/vote to http://www.nationalmovieawards.com/vote

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Should we link "another name" in the plot summary to Jesus of Nazareth or God?
C.S. Lewis was a well-documented Christian, and as his Wikipedia page even cites in the "Christian apologist" section, to him, Aslan was supposed to represent Jesus.

So, in the plot summary for this film, at the part that says "Aslan encourages them to know him in their world by another name", should we link "another name" to the Wikipedia page for Jesus of Nazareth? It's pretty obvious what or who Aslan is referring to. Or should we respect the "death of the author"? I'm not Christian, don't want to offend anyone or step on any toes.

Thanks. HalfHazard98 (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * FWIW, this was previously "discussed" here, though I acknowledge that it's exaggerating to call it a "discussion". DonIago (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)