Talk:The ClementJames Centre

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- I understand previous original justification for this classification, and so I have now modified the article to make it appear less self promoting. I believe there are now good links to good Wikipedia articles, and links to notable external publications. This is a solid charity, starved of a public profile, despite doing very valuable work in a deprived inner city area. Thanks Simonjon (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Furthermore, the speedy deletion request was not from a registered Wikipedia user, but an anonymous IP address. Simonjon (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree, it seems reasonably well-written. I've removed the tag.  Good job on the article so far.  JYolkowski // talk 18:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you JYolkowski. Simonjon (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

More statistics
A small note, but this article could have more statistics. They are hard to find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.207.151 (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)