Talk:The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid

Why the Ring probably has nothing to do with Yu-Gi-Oh
Yu-Gi-Oh! the manga was first released in Japan in 1996. It has taken the American Shonen Jump two and a half years to get to the Egypt arc when the Millenium Ring is first mentioned, so I'll be generous and say that it took one year to get that way in Japan (it ran on Weekly Shonen Jump). Even if this is the case, there's a one-year time span between this and the 1998 release of 4th Grade Adventures. How likely is it that a writer important enough to influence the plot of a game made for an American company is enough of a fan of the then-fledgling manga almost exlusively known in Japan that he would make such a change? Another point to consider would be that after three years there has been no mention of Set in American Shonen Jump. I personally am unfamiliar with much of the Yu-Gi-Oh plot, but I don't believe such a plotline will come for several more months. This only shortens the time span in which said writer could have enacted such a change. Plus, this writer already has a deadline long before the release date, which makes it even more unlikely that there is a relation between the two.

In addition, please also consider 24.69.255.205's history as a vandal (he originally put that paragraph in the article) by going here.

Requested move
The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: The Puzzle of Pyramids → The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid — The reason for the move was basically self-explanatory, but here's the required discussion anyway. 67.171.163.212 19:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Go to WP:RM make a proper discussion using the templates there, including especially the name to which you propose moving it as well as the discussion framework with its instructions.  I don't remember exactly what that was, had something to do with the word the but the text of the article already uses a different version from the title.  Furthermore, why isn't this at Puzzle of the Pyramids or The Puzzle of Pyramids or The Puzzle of the Pyramids or Puzzle of Pyramids or whatever?  Gene Nygaard 16:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I thought this was pretty clear-cut. The person who created this article obviously misspelled the title and I've provided a link that shows what the title should be (The ClueFinders 4th Grade Adventures: Puzzle of the Pyramid) and it's the same one that's already included in the text of the article. I can't see how you have any ground to stand on or why you would even want oppose what is quite obviously the correction of a mistake. 67.171.163.212 23:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I've moved the page. This move was just a title correction based on a source.  I also corrected it in the text; it had an extra "the" in it. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CF4.JPG
Image:CF4.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)