Talk:The Concert for Bangladesh (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 17:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

This is a good album. The articles become better and better :)-- GoP T C N 17:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): {{GAList/checkayeb (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
 * Fails WP:NFCC, 3 a) and b). I think the last could be shortened, but overall meets the criteria as it is a significant re-release. I would remove the second image with the white background completely. The first is far too large. -- GoP T C N 13:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by the last could be shortened(?), but I've removed the second image as suggested. Will look for smaller-size version of first image. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
 * Fails WP:NFCC, 3 a) and b). I think the last could be shortened, but overall meets the criteria as it is a significant re-release. I would remove the second image with the white background completely. The first is far too large. -- GoP T C N 13:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by the last could be shortened(?), but I've removed the second image as suggested. Will look for smaller-size version of first image. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by the last could be shortened(?), but I've removed the second image as suggested. Will look for smaller-size version of first image. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall: Excellent article.
 * Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}


 * Pass Good article. Sorry for the delay as I was in Olympics fever =). Regards.-- GoP T C N 13:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * And if you answer the question raised by an ip in 2011, then that would be an advantage :): What happened to the child on the album cover? Where is he/she today? . Regards.-- GoP T C N 13:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Fantastic − thanks GoP. Yes, the child on the cover: either aged in his/her early 40s now, I guess, or never made it out of the camps in northern India in 1971 (let's hope it's the first option). Good call with the album covers, by the way. The white-background CD cover really was unnecessary as an alt example, and I think the more smoky appearance of the (replaced) original cover is actually truer to how the boxed record looked (from what I've seen over the years). PS: what Olympics? ; ) ... Cheers, JG66 (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)