Talk:The Conquest of Belgrade/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

A beautiful article. Here are my comments:


 * Lead:
 * As per WP:MOSLEAD I think it's best to keep only one translation of the name in the lead. Both translated names can go to the info box.
 * one art historian Can we know who?
 * At places you say 1844-45, elsewhere you say 1812-1872. Consistency would be good.


 * Article:
 * Say either Romantic or romantic.

No copyvio issues, images properly licensed. The above points addressed I would be happy to promote this. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 15:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * All done, but I can't see where it says 1812-1872 for the life of me. Please help me out. Thanks, 23 editor (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I found this and another instance in Background. Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 17:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok, I see what you mean. I've removed it as off-topic. I thought you were saying the article mentioned the painting as being dated 1812-72. 23 editor (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I believe this is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 17:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)