Talk:The Coward's Anthem

This is an album by a fairly notable hip hop group on both the national, and international level.
 * Unfortunately, there is no evidence of that. Do you have any third-party sources to prove this? Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 01:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * http://youtube.com/watch?v=zxkTeg0mC8o here's a video of them on tour in korea.
 * http://www.thecaptainslog.org/story.php?id=400 and here's an article about them, which mentions their extensive touring, including japan, korea and guam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pikafire69 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * These don't appear to be reliable sources. Do you know of any sources such as newspaper or magazine articles which mention them? You may wish to read WP:BAND to see if they are notable enough for inclusion into Wikipedia. DigitalC (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, even if they were determined to be notable, that does not mean that their album is notable. DigitalC (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * http://www.cornerstonefestival.com/BandBio.cfm?bID=679&g=1 Here's some evidence of them being notable, playing in a large music festival
 * and as far as their album the policy i read says, "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." So, as an official release by a notable band, the albums would qualify. pikafire69 —Preceding comment was added at 10:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "In general" and "may" are important words here. Continuing on, it says, "Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage." If this band's albums have sufficient independent coverage in reliable sources, then they are likely to be notable. Otherwise, they should be covered within the band's article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If this bothered you so much that you had to get rid of it as a separate article, it would have been curteous to at least merge the information onto the band's article. Is there a way for me to go back to the version of this page that I previously had and move that information onto the band's article? Or do I have to type it all out again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pikafire69 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

←It wasn't my intention to be discourteous. I was unaware that you didn't know how to access the information in history. It's still right there and you can easily retrieve it to copy & paste it elsewhere. (Note that copying & pasting somebody else's work is a different matter. Because of the licensing we use, there are special procedures to follow when copying somebody else's words. The original contributor can simply move it, so long as nobody else has substantially contributed text.) It doesn't bother me at all. It's not personal; addressing articles tagged for deletion, I saw this one did not fit the criteria but also did not substantial notability sufficient to remain as was. Rather than nominate the article for deletion, I redirected it. I didn't copy the material over because it isn't sourced, and without sourcing it doesn't meet one of our core content policies. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)