Talk:The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!

I would strongly suggest not to delete the article
Using google helps to see at a glance why of course the article is a relevant lemma And as far as I'm informed Martin H. Glynn was the first one to use the noun holocaust with reference to jews.

Aborvegyro 11:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * That's an false-positive as you're getting 300,000 hits searching on any combination of the words, not on the title. Searching on "The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop" brings up a grand total of 69 hits, mostly from message boards —  irides cent   (talk to me!)  11:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No it's not a false positive. Have a look inside. For sample here or here. Aborvegyro 11:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not saying there are no ghits - I'm saying there are 69, of which that's one, and not 300,000+. As I say, if you can provide references to show this paper is important I'll withdraw the nomination, but I certainly can't find them - not a single major news organisation or academic source using the term, and by page two of the search we're already up to "Playstation 3 forum" - but as I say, the sources may not be online for something this old. Incidentally, the OED dates the first recorded use of "holocaust" in its modern sense ("the massacre of a large number of people, particularly by the use of fire") to 1671, and it was already in common usage by the mid 19th century (see Names of the Holocaust —  irides cent   (talk to me!)  12:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * See above Aborvegyro 13:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

hint: on nizkor they discuss the article Glynn worte
here you go Aborvegyro