Talk:The Culinary Institute of America/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 18:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's fine, no rush. Thanks! ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Managed to add all my comments, returning only for reviews! This article is so well-written, I have only a few comments:  Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * In History:
 * sixteen students "sixteen" would look better in digits as per the MOS.
 * I like to keep history sections with more prose and less numbers if I can; and MOS:NUMERAL is okay with either. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, your choice. Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * "name was changed" is repeated at the end of the first para, how about "renamed"?
 * Done. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also in 2015 Can be better worded as "The same year"
 * Done. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The college is opening a campus Better add "As of 2016".
 * Done. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * purchased the northern portion of the property When?
 * This sentence is just more information about the same purchase, in 2015. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * In Campus media:mise en place Does it not begin with caps?
 * That's correct, it's stylized in that fashion. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * In The CIA Singapore: Temasek Polytechnic is a duplink
 * It's often seen as okay in certain circumstances. Here I link it in the history section, however many people just reading about the campuses (or not reading history/any large paragraphs) will surely miss that earlier link and presume there's no page on Temasek, if it lacks a link in that campus section, pretty far down the page too I might add. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. Duplinks are good in some cases... Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Parts of Campus media, Campuses, Brandig and Augie award need citations. Even if they do not need sources.
 * Looking into this... ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I added some sources already, but I have more to go... ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 17:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I think you are busy elsewhere, when can we finish working on the last point? Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. I did a bit more recently; I will get to it again tomorrow. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No hurry, just let me know when you are done. The review is open till we keep working. :) Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 04:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, I added a lot more references, what do you think now? ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 17:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Much better! Only three parts look unsourced:
 * The CIA Singapore section
 * In popular media section
 * Not all points on the alumni look sourced.

These fixed, I would be glad to promote this. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, it should be fixed now. By the way, I'm curious if you'll be willing to review my FAC Briarcliff Manor Public Library, perhaps in turn for me reviewing your FAC Springbok? I likely need more eyes on the library article in order for it to pass. ɱ  (talk · vbm  · coi) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Great, I am happy to promote this article. Thanks for your kind offer, I am willing to review any nomination I have some idea about. Will take some time out for it. Try springbok of you get time, no quid pro quo necessary. Cheers, Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 03:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)