Talk:The Daily Mash/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: As well as can be expected.

I was going to come in here and complain about the length, but length is not a GA criteria requirement; covering the major aspects of a topic is, and frankly, after looking around a bit at other sources, this article seems to cover them. Nice little article, I hope it continues to grow. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 05:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)