Talk:The Daltons (Lucky Luke)

picture
We don't have a single picture of the Daltons? Come on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.64.221.238 (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references
The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references, which this article is tagged as clearly needing. Valid sources about Morris and Goscinny could be utilized to reference the origin of the Dalton cousins, but the canon itself is a valuable source that cannot be dismissed out of hand. To do so is tantamount to page vandalism.TH1980 (talk) 03:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * First of all, random accusations of vandalism are not a good way to start a discussion. Secondly, you misunderstand what the tag means: it asks for more sources - that is not fixed by retelling several anecdotes from one of the books in the series.  Mezigue (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the "vandalism" comment, but my intention is to source this page starting with pertinent references to books in the canon, using select anecdotes to amplify what is already presented.TH1980 (talk) 04:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

"To each on their own"?
A Lucky Luke story cointaining The Daltons named "To each on their own" is mentioned severeal times in the article. However, I couldn't find anything about such a story. Does it even exist? Is the name cited correctly? --JakobvS (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The actual title appears to be Cavalier Seul. No idea where this English title comes from.  I have removed this obsessive retelling of this particular book twice but, well see discussion just above. Mezigue (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)